ICT Decoded · Top-Down Analysis: From the Daily Bias to the Five-Minute Chart

    What Is ICT Top-Down Analysis?

    By — reads every firm’s official rulebook, checks prices and codes daily, and maintains the Enigma Score · Methodology · Editorial policy · Last updated November 1, 2026

    ICT concepts were created and are taught by Michael J. Huddleston, The Inner Circle Trader (X · YouTube). This lesson is FundedEnigma’s own summary, not affiliated with or endorsed by ICT.

    In short: ICT top-down analysis reads from the higher timeframe down, giving each chart one job: the daily chart gives the bias, the one-hour chart the structure (the dealing range and which half price is in) and the five-minute chart the timing (a market structure shift the same way). On our data, aligning all three did not make shifts go further.

    ICT Top-Down Analysis Explained: Daily Bias to the 5-Minute Chart (Does Timeframe Alignment Help?) · 8:12 · published November 1, 2026 · part of the ICT Concepts Decoded playlist

    Watch the video

    The full video is embedded above this article: ICT Top-Down Analysis Explained: Daily Bias to the 5-Minute Chart (Does Timeframe Alignment Help?). This page is the written version, with every chart walked through step by step. Jump to any part of the video:

    • 0:00 Intro
    • 0:49 What top-down analysis is
    • 1:20 Three timeframes, three jobs
    • 2:07 How we define it
    • 2:59 Example 1: the hourly range ends first
    • 4:47 Example 2: all three agree, then cancelled
    • 5:55 What the data says
    • 6:54 Using it
    • 7:21 Recap

    Key facts: top-down analysis at a glance

    TimeframeIts jobHow we define it
    DailyBiasYesterday's candle against the day before's range: a close beyond it, or a run of it that closes back inside; the draw is yesterday's high or low
    One hourStructureThe dealing range at the last hourly close (most recent untraded swing high and low, at least two average hourly candles apart) and whether price is in its right half
    Five minuteTimingA market structure shift after a named pool is taken, between 8:30 AM and noon
    AlignedAll three agreeSame direction, price in the right half of an hourly range that is still intact at the shift
    CancelledThe shift failsPrice trades back beyond the sweep's extreme

    Last verified 2026-11-01. All charts below are real historical CME NQ futures data, shown in New York time.

    NQ 5-minute chart, January 15, 2026: the daily bias bearish, the one-hour range falling, and at 9:51 AM a five-minute shift down through 25,853.50
    NQ 5M, Jan 15, 2026. Three charts, one read.

    Here is the idea on a real chart. On January 15, 2026, the daily chart said bearish and the one-hour chart showed price high in a falling range. Then price ran above that range, and at 9:51 AM the five-minute chart shifted down. It looked like three charts telling one story, and price did work lower into the afternoon. But by our own rules the three were not fully lined up, and that is the point of this lesson.

    What is top-down analysis in trading?

    ICT (Michael J. Huddleston) teaches analysis from the top down: start on the higher timeframe, decide what it is likely to do, and only then look at the lower timeframes. A five-minute chart on its own shows shifts in both directions all day. Without the bigger picture, every one of them looks equally important. Top-down analysis is a way to decide which ones are worth your attention, and which are going against the larger move.

    Which timeframes should you use for top-down analysis?

    We use three timeframes, each with one job: daily, one hour and five minute.

    1. The daily chart gives the bias: which side of yesterday's range today is more likely to reach. That is our daily bias lesson's rule.
    2. The one-hour chart gives the structure: the leg price is working inside, and whether price is in the right half of it, discount of an up leg or premium of a down leg. That is the dealing range and premium and discount rule on the one-hour chart.
    3. The five-minute chart gives the timing: a market structure shift in the same direction. Liquidity taken, then the swing before it traded through.

    The pairing is not fixed. Some traders use the four-hour, the fifteen-minute and the one-minute charts instead; our intraday bias lesson reads the four-hour candles. The idea is the same: each chart answers a smaller question inside the one above it.

    How do you align timeframes?

    In this lesson, three timeframes are aligned when all three point the same way, with price in the right half of an hourly range that is still intact at the shift.

    • If price trades beyond either end of the hourly range before the five-minute shift, that range is over, so the shift is not aligned.
    • If price trades back beyond the sweep's extreme, the shift is cancelled.

    What does top-down analysis look like on real charts?

    Example 1: the hourly range ends first, January 15, 2026

    NQ daily chart, January 2026: January 14 closed at 25,612.00, below January 13's low of 25,803.25, a bearish displacement close; the draw is January 14's low of 25,420.75
    NQ daily, Jan 2026. The bias: bearish.
    1. Daily: January 14 closed at 25,612.00, below the low of the day before. A displacement close, so the bias is bearish. The draw is yesterday's low, 25,420.75.
    NQ 1-hour chart, January 13-15, 2026: a down leg from 25,925.75 (also yesterday's high) to the most recent swing low of 25,569.50; at the 9:00 AM close price is at 25,893.75, high in premium
    NQ 1H, Jan 13-15, 2026. A falling range, price in premium.
    1. One hour: the range runs from 25,925.75, which is also yesterday's high, down to the most recent swing low at 25,569.50. A down leg. At the 9:00 AM close price is at 25,893.75, high in premium. Bias and structure agree.
    NQ 5-minute chart, January 15, 2026: yesterday's high of 25,925.75 taken at 9:22 AM, ending the hourly range; a first shift at 9:30 cancelled at 9:45 by a new high of 25,952.75; a second shift at 9:51 through 25,853.50; one more leg down to 25,733.25 reached at 3:00 PM
    NQ 5M, Jan 15, 2026. The hourly range ends first.
    1. Five minute: at 9:22 AM price trades above yesterday's high. That is also the top of the hourly range, so by our dealing range rule that range is over.
    2. The first shift down, at 9:30 AM, is cancelled fifteen minutes later when price makes a new high at 25,952.75.
    3. At 9:51 AM price trades below the 9:35 AM candle's low at 25,853.50: a second shift down. The daily bias and the five-minute chart agree, but the hourly range it would have lined up with ended half an hour earlier. By our rule, it is not aligned.
    4. It is slow. Price climbs back to 25,938.00 at 12:09 PM without cancelling the shift, then works lower and reaches one more leg down at 3:00 PM. Yesterday's low is never reached. A good day for the read, but not an aligned one, and the data counts it that way.

    Example 2: all three agree, then cancelled, June 29, 2026

    NQ 5-minute chart, June 29, 2026: the London high of 29,732.75 taken at 6:37 AM, a shift down at 8:38 through the 7:20 candle's low, cancelled at 9:34 when price traded above 29,759.75; a low of 29,273.75 at 10:15 AM, Friday's low of 29,160.50 not reached, and a high of 30,069.50 at 2:46 PM
    NQ 5M, Jun 29, 2026. Aligned, then cancelled.
    1. Daily: Friday, June 26, closed at 29,283.00, below Thursday's low. Bearish again, with the draw at Friday's low, 29,160.50.
    2. One hour: the range runs from 29,922.50 down to the most recent swing low at 29,255.00. At 8:00 AM price is in its premium.
    3. Five minute: at 6:37 AM the London high is taken. At 8:38 AM the five-minute chart shifts down. The hourly range is still intact, so this time all three line up.
    4. At 9:34 AM price trades above the sweep's high at 29,759.75. The shift is cancelled.
    5. Price does fall later, to 29,273.75 at 10:15 AM, but it never reaches Friday's low. By the afternoon it is above 30,000. The timeframes agreed, and the day still went its own way.

    Does timeframe alignment work?

    On our data, lining up the timeframes did not make five-minute shifts go further. We took the grade A five-minute shifts, the ones after a named pool, between 8:30 AM and noon, from January 2020 to September 2026, leaving out days with a contract roll nearby: 1,264 shifts on 915 days.

    • Aligned shifts (66) reached one more leg before they were cancelled about 24 times in 100. Across all shifts, about 23 in 100. That is no real difference.
    • The daily bias showed up in one place. When yesterday's level in the shift's direction was still there, it was taken before the shift was cancelled about one time in six when the daily bias agreed, and about one time in eleven when it did not. Adding the hourly chart did not improve on that.
    • Aligned shifts were cancelled by 4:00 PM at least as often as any others.

    How do you use top-down analysis in your own charting?

    Use top-down analysis to organise your read, not as a filter that makes setups work.

    • Read in order. Daily, then one hour, then five minute. Each chart answers a smaller question.
    • Say which chart you mean. "Bearish on the daily, premium of the one-hour range" is a clear read; "bearish" alone is not.
    • Let a cancelled shift tell you something. It means the lower timeframe has not agreed yet.
    • Don't expect alignment to do the work. On our data, the daily bias mattered for whether yesterday's level got taken; lining up all three did not make shifts more reliable.

    More concepts in the series are on the ICT Concepts Decoded hub. If you trade futures with a prop firm, you can look up a firm's rules on the challenges page or set two firms side by side on the compare page.

    Frequently asked questions

    What timeframes does ICT top-down analysis use?

    A higher timeframe for the bias, a middle one for the structure and a lower one for the timing. We use daily, one hour and five minute; four hour, fifteen minute and one minute is another common ladder.

    Does lining up the timeframes make a setup more likely to work?

    Not on our data. Aligned five-minute shifts reached one more leg about 24 times in 100, against 23 for all shifts, and were cancelled at least as often.

    What does the daily bias add?

    On our data, it helped with whether yesterday's level got taken: about one time in six when the bias agreed with the shift, against about one in eleven when it did not.

    What ends the one-hour structure?

    A trade beyond either end of the one-hour dealing range. After that, the range is over and a new one has to be marked, so a shift that comes later is not aligned with it.

    Is top-down analysis the same as intraday bias?

    They are related. The intraday bias lesson runs the daily bias rule on the four-hour candles; top-down analysis is the wider habit of reading from the higher timeframe down to the lower one.

    Sources

    Last verified: 2026-11-01. Written by Steve H.

    Disclaimer: This page is for education only and is not financial advice. Trading futures involves substantial risk of loss. Past price behaviour does not guarantee future results.

    • Reading Candles: Open, High, Low, Close and Wicks: How to read a candle the ICT way: open, high, low, close, the order they print in, expansion, reversal and indecision candles, and the wick's 50%, on three real NQ sessions and 4,195 sessions of data.
    • Dealing Ranges and Average Daily Range (ADR): What an ICT dealing range is, how to measure average daily range (ADR), and what 4,175 NQ sessions and 473 New York mornings say about each, on three real NQ charts.
    • Phases of Price: Consolidation, Expansion, Retracement, Reversal: The four ICT phases of price (consolidation, expansion, retracement, reversal) with a testable rule for each, two real NQ sessions and what 527 days of 15-minute data say about each phase.
    • The A+ Entry Checklist: ICT's Setup in Order: ICT's A+ entry checklist as seven checkable boxes, two real NQ sessions and what 1,919 five-minute setups say about ticking more of them.
    • The Silver Bullet: ICT's One-Hour Window: ICT's Silver Bullet defined so it can be checked, two real NQ mornings and what 1,534 days say about whether the 10 to 11 AM hour matters.
    • Breaker + FVG (the Unicorn) and the Box Setup: ICT's breaker + FVG pairing and the box setup, defined so they can be checked, four real NQ mornings and what 2020-2026 NQ data says about each.
    • ICT's Son's Model and the Twitter Model: ICT's son's model and the Twitter model, defined so they can be checked, four real NQ mornings and what 2020-2026 NQ data says about each.
    • Broadening Formations: ICT broadening formations defined so they can be checked: 15-minute, daily and session versions on real NQ charts, and what 2020-2026 NQ data says.
    • Trading Without a Structure Break: Reading a raid before the market structure shift, defined so it can be checked: three real NQ mornings and what 2020-2026 NQ data says about the early read versus waiting for the shift.
    • Stops, Sizing and Trailing for Prop Accounts: Stops placed where the idea is wrong, sizing by a fixed risk, and what tighter stops, trailing and losing runs looked like on 2020-2026 NQ data, for a prop account's drawdown limit.
    • News and the Economic Calendar: Filtering the economic calendar, ICT's idea of news as the catalyst, three real NQ release days and what CPI, jobs-report and Fed days did on 2020-2026 NQ data.
    • Why Traders Fail with ICT (and the Fix): Why traders struggle with ICT: the busy chart tested on 2020-2026 NQ, boxes drawn for no reason, losing streaks in one fixed rule, and how to make your trading measurable.
    • Currency Futures and the Dollar Index (6E, 6B, DXY): 6E, 6B and the dollar index explained, why a forex pair is a fraction, and whether picking the pair from yesterday's daily candle worked on 2010-2026 daily data.
    • EURGBP for Relative Strength (EURUSD vs GBPUSD): EURGBP as a live gauge of relative strength between EURUSD and GBPUSD, two real New York mornings, and a test of whether it tells you in advance.
    • Internal vs External Liquidity: Where pullbacks stop and where the next leg goes: the back and forth between old highs and lows and fair value gaps.
    • Market Structure: Read the trend from swing highs and lows, and tell a real change in trend from a pullback.
    • Protected and Relevant Swings: Rank swing highs and lows, see how a swing becomes protected, and focus on the relevant ones.
    • Market Structure Shift: Spot the turn: a stop raid, then displacement through the swing that started the last push.
    • MSS vs Liquidity Grab: The wick shows the stops were taken; the close and what follows show whether price meant it.
    • Premium, Discount and Equilibrium: Split the dealing range at its 50%: longs in discount, shorts in premium.
    • Optimal Trade Entry (OTE): The 62-79% band of a clean leg: where to look on a pullback, with a reason inside it.
    • Fair Value Gaps (FVG): Three candles that don't overlap: mark it wick to wick and judge it by the closes.
    • Inversion Fair Value Gaps (IFVG): A gap a candle body closed through: it can flip sides, and where it forms decides if it matters.
    • Order Blocks: The last opposite-close candles before the shift: frame them with bodies and only count them after a sweep, a shift and displacement.
    • Breaker Blocks: An order block that failed after a sweep: frame the candles of the broken swing with bodies and judge them by the closes.
    • Mitigation Blocks: A breaker's shape without the sweep: the second swing stops short, price breaks the swing between, and the candles in that second swing become the block.
    • Propulsion Blocks: An order block built on an order block: a candle dips into a fresh order block, holds its middle, closes back out, and a close beyond its open makes its body the block.
    • Change in State of Delivery (CISD): A body close back through the open of the run that made the high or low: the first sign that the other side has taken over.
    • Killzones and key times of day: ICT's windows of the day in New York time, Asia, London and New York, plus the key opening times: when to look, not which way to go.
    • Daily bias: Which side of yesterday's range today is more likely to reach, read from yesterday's candle, with yesterday's 50% as the line to respect.
    • Intraday bias: The daily bias read on the four-hour candles: which side of the last candle's range the next one is more likely to reach.
    • Power of three (AMD): Accumulation, manipulation and distribution: the range, the wick and the body of a daily candle, and how to check a manipulation.
    • Standard deviation projections: Which leg to measure, the -1, -2, -2.5 and -4 marks, when they are void, and how often NQ actually reached them.
    • Inducement: The small swing high or low in front of a zone, why price runs it on the way in, and whether it helps the zone hold.
    • SMT Divergence: When NQ and ES disagree at the same level, what that one-sided sweep says, the confirmation to wait for, and how often it held.
    • High vs Low Resistance Liquidity: How to read the path between price and a pool: a clean path left by a fast move, or a crowded path of defended highs, and why distance matters more.
    • London Reversal Daily Profile: The ICT London reversal daily profile: London runs one side of the night and turns, New York continues. Rules, real NQ sessions and how often it held.
    • New York Daily Profiles: Three ICT daily profiles where New York turns the day: the New York manipulation, the New York reversal and seek and destroy, with real NQ sessions and how often each showed up.
    • Weekly Profiles: Classic Expansion and Midweek Reversal: Two ICT weekly profiles, the classic expansion and the midweek reversal: which day makes the weekly wick, three real NQ weeks and how often each showed up.
    • Weekly Profiles: Consolidation Reversal, Intraweek Reversal, Thursday Counter and TGIF: Four ICT weekly profiles, the consolidation reversal, intraweek reversal, Thursday counter and TGIF, on four real NQ weeks and 731 weeks of data.
    • Draw on Liquidity: Which high or low price is most likely to reach next, and two simple reads to pick the side.
    • Liquidity: Where stop orders rest above highs and below lows, and how price runs from one pool to the next.
    • All ICT Concepts Decoded lessons (the series hub)
    • The ICT Concepts Decoded playlist on YouTube

    Keep learning

    Prop firm deals & news, in your inbox

    A weekly roundup of the best live discounts, a featured firm, and our newest videos and reviews.

    Free. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email.

    FTC Disclosure

    FundedEnigma is a comparison website that may receive compensation from the prop trading firms listed on this site. This compensation may impact how and where firms appear on our site (including the order in which they appear). Our site does not include all prop firms available in the market. We strive to keep information accurate and up-to-date, but we do not guarantee the accuracy of information presented on this site. The views and opinions expressed on this site are solely those of the authors.

    Risk Disclaimer

    Trading futures, forex, and other leveraged products involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The high degree of leverage can work against you as well as for you. Before deciding to trade, you should carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite. You should be aware of all the risks associated with trading and seek advice from an independent financial advisor if you have any doubts. FundedEnigma does not provide financial, investment, or trading advice.

    © 2026 FundedEnigma. All rights reserved.